Showing posts with label pharmacists. Show all posts
Showing posts with label pharmacists. Show all posts

Tuesday, December 4, 2012

NL Independent Pharmacy Owners (CICPO) win National Award

CICPO Board at the Ritz Hotel Toronto to receive National Award
Celebrating the independent spirit...
The winners of this year’s Lifetime Achievement Award demonstrate that leadership is very much a group effort, particularly when it involves the unique challenges faced by independent pharmacies.

Newfoundland and Labrador is an unusual market in that a significant proportionof its pharmacies comprise independents, unlike the rest of Canada (where independents make up less than 20% of the market). While the breakdown in pharmacy formats has little bearing in day-to-day operations and patient care, recent government reforms highlighted the need to bridge the geographic and communication gaps among independent pharmacies. Two priorities emerged: how to cope with deep pricing cuts for generic medications and how to provide more services that take advantage of new government funds (for medication reviews, for example).

A handful of independent pharmacists established the Council of Independent Community Pharmacy Owners (CICPO) in 2008. When they’re not running their own pharmacies and providing innovative
services to their patients, the members of the current board—Wayne Morris, Robert Doyle, Phil O’Keefe, Mary Byrne, Todd Squires, Doug Stanley, Beverly Vey, and Bill Simmons—log thousands of volunteer hours annually to support their peers during this time of transition and to advocate on behalf of their patients. “These pharmacists regularly help other pharmacies in Newfoundland and Labrador find their way under these new circumstances, to ensure the continuity of pharmacy
services to all people,” says Sue Kelland-Dyer, CICPO’s executive director. “They operate in very small rural communities and inner city neighbourhoods, bringing essential front line health care to all people, and further promote this vision on a day-today basis to government, insurance companies,
media, and the public at large.”

With almost 200 years of professional service among them, all CICPO board members seek out media exposure and have made presentations to government departments. Two of the board members
have sought political office. Their message is not just about the expanding role of the pharmacist, but also the expansion of care and resources for the management of chronic disease in general, to improve savings and health outcomes in the long run. In its first year of operation, Wayne Morris,
one of CICPO’s founding members, took up temporary residence at a hotel in St. John’s for 70 days in order to ensure his seat at the table during government negotiations.
Mary Byrne, another member, successfully lobbied for the removal of tobacco products from pharmacies. Doug Stanley dedicated himself to recruit physicians to serve his remote area. Throughout it all, using Facebook and one-on-one conversations, the board reaches out to other independent pharmacies to help them understand and respond to the ongoing changes in pharmacy’s business model and professional practice.

“This is a team effort that truly shows that change can only happen if people collaborate with each other and look out for our pharmacy profession as a whole,” notes one of the Commitment to Care judges.
—Karen Welds

Thursday, June 7, 2012

CICPO and Medavie Blue Cross Reach New Agreement


NEWS RELEASE

CICPO and Medavie Blue Cross

New Contract seeks to Maximize Health Outcomes while Controlling Costs

2012-07-06 St. John’s NL – For Immediate Release 

The Council of Independent Community Pharmacy Owners NL and Medavie Blue Cross are pleased to advise they have reached a new 3 (three) year agreement.  This is the second successful negotiation of a contract between the two parties and includes financial terms that address the recent generic drug pricing reforms.

This agreement comes at a time when independent pharmacy revenues are being eroded by changes to generic drug pricing at the governmental level. “We are pleased to see Medavie Blue Cross participate in a process of real negotiation and meaningful recognition of independent pharmacy in Newfoundland and Labrador,” says Director of Third Party Relations CICPO, Phil O’Keefe.

“Medavie Blue Cross recognizes the impact of rising drug costs on the industry and our clients”, said Laurier Fecteau, Senior Vice President, Medavie Blue Cross. “We have worked with CICPO’s independent pharmacies to develop unique agreements to ensure all our members have access to the best value at their local pharmacy.”

O’Keefe adds, “Our Council represents local pharmacy service and product delivery in all regions of our province and Medavie Blue Cross recognizes the importance of our role in front-line health care – whether located in rural communities or inner-city neighbourhoods. This continued progressive relationship will achieve best health outcomes at the least possible cost.”

Fecteau continued, “We recognize the important role of Pharmacy in servicing our clients and plan members.  We understand the unique circumstances of independent pharmacies and are pleased we were once again able to negotiate a contract that recognizes the importance of rural and neighbourhood pharmacies in the communities where they do business.”


Both parties continue to develop best practices in their respective responsibilities of health benefits provision and pharmacy collaborative care, and are working jointly on initiatives in the areas of medication and disease management, and collaborative care between pharmacist, physician and patient.

 “Medavie Blue Cross demonstrates an understanding of our unique geography, demographics and pharmacy model – which results in knowledgeable discussions about improving front-line health care delivery. As a result, the people we both serve benefit from a cost perspective and by maximizing best-health outcomes”, concludes O’Keefe.
Both parties also look forward to continued development of pilot projects in the areas of medication and disease management, and the promotion of collaborative care between pharmacist, physician, and patient. 

Medavie Blue Cross, based in Moncton, New Brunswick, offers health, life, and travel products to individuals and employers in Atlantic Canada, Quebec and Ontario.  The Council of Independent Community Pharmacy Owners is a trade body for local pharmacies in Newfoundland and Labrador.

-30-

About the Council of Independent Community Pharmacy Owners

A progressive trade organization representing the majority of independent pharmacies in Newfoundland and Labrador, the Council offers its members business support, third party negotiations, research and development of pilot projects and advanced policy positions. Additionally the Council works with industry partners to ensure the continuity of equitable front-line health care services in all regions of our province.

At a time when Atlantic Canada is experiencing an aging population with escalating occurrences of chronic disease, the Council is dedicated to maximize best health outcomes at the least cost through medication and disease management programs.


About Medavie Blue Cross

With roots dating back to 1943, Medavie Blue Cross provides health, travel, life and income
replacement products to group and individual customers, administers various provincial and federal government-sponsored health programs and, through subsidiary companies, manages ambulance services in New Brunswick, Nova Scotia, Prince Edward Island and the Muskoka and Chatham-Kent
regions of Ontario.

A member of the Canadian Association of Blue Cross Plans, Medavie Blue Cross operates from offices in Moncton, Dartmouth, Montreal and Toronto as well as Quebec City, Halifax, Fredericton, Saint John, Bathurst, Charlottetown and St. John’s.

Thursday, March 8, 2012

Complete Investigation needed on Drug Costs

Will Dunderdale, Ball, or Michael investigate? $$$$ LOST!

We have now entered a time-frame industry people like to call the Patent Cliff.

Over the next 5 years residents of Newfoundland and Labrador as with all other jurisdictions in Canada and the USA should experience an extreme reduction in the price of essential commonly prescribed medications.

As these new generics enter the marketplace - our government should act immediately to replace the brand drugs on our formulary. This will save us tens of millions of dollars.

Unfortunately we still have a secret committee determining when our tax dollars will be used wisely.

If you can buy the drug in New Brunswick, Alberta, or Ontario - why not here in our province?

Why are our hospitals permitted to dispense drugs that our retail pharmacies cannot?

Why does our government pay brand prices when savings of 40 per cent and more are available?

Sue's Blog will layout some of the financial losses our government has allowed of our essential health care dollars.

We also need to discuss and understand if there are any potential conflicts within the secret committee that answers only to the Minister - and NOT the House of Assembly. We need to know if any member of the committee has any dealings with the drug companies - outside of the committee - and whether those dealings are commercial in nature.

Is it possible that any committee members - who have the power of recommendation to the Minister of Health - could use that power in commercial dealings?

Do the Brand Drug Houses lobby any of the committee members - in any way whatsoever?

You see something is not right here. We are losing tens of millions of dollars and nothing is being done about it. Sound Familiar?

Open and Transparent - right? Public Accounts - spending our money wisely right?

Where is the investigative journalism? Where are the NDP members on this - they are the champions of health care right?

Monday, March 5, 2012

Nova Scotia - Take Heed Newfoundland and Labrador

Let's see if the Government of Newfoundland and Labrador follows the lead of provinces such as Ontario and closer to home Nova Scotia.


Generic price caps blamed for closure of Nova Scotia village pharmacy
 

(Carol Moreira - CanadianHealthcareNetwork)
 

The only pharmacy in the Nova Scotia village of Lawrencetown will close this summer and critics are blaming the cap on the price of generic drugs, introduced last year.

Pharmacy co-owner Rob Perry told the Chronicle-Herald that lower generic prices played a role in the store's closure, although rising costs and falling income also contributed.


"Economically, it's just not feasible. It's more expensive to run a business than it was two years ago," Perry said. The Lawrencetown Pharmasave opened in 1955 and will close on June 30th.


Allison Bodnar, executive director of the Pharmacy Association of Nova Scotia said the Lawrencetown Pharmasave is the first closure, but many pharmacies are suffering because of the cap on the price of generics sold to Pharmacare recipients.


 "Reduced hours, staff layoffs, reduced services and even further closures can be expected as the final legislated price cuts take effect this summer," Bodnar said.

Challenges and Recognition - Pharmacists - your Health


NEWS RELEASE

March 4-10 2012 PHARMACISTS’ AWARENESS WEEK – CHALLENGES AND RECOGNITION

For Immediate Release – St. John’s 02/03 2012

The Council of Independent Community Pharmacy Owners is pleased to support Pharmacists’ Awareness Week with our valued employees.

Each of our member corporations recognizes the valued contribution of pharmacists in our society. Through progressive and supportive employee and employer relationships our businesses are proud of the services we provide to people, neighbourhoods and communities.

The pharmacist continues to be one of the most trusted professions and independent pharmacy one of the most trusted businesses. This week celebrates the work a pharmacist does whether as an employee of government, the University, hospitals, Centre for Health Information, or of the private sector. Our corporate members will continue to work toward providing a stable workplace for our professional staff. Our members companies continue to lobby government for medication management programs that allow our communities to avail of preventative and stabilization consults that our employees are fully qualified to do.
 
Executive Director, Sue Kelland-Dyer says, “The scope of practice of Newfoundland and Labrador pharmacists is lagging behind many other provinces in Canada. The CICPO encourages the Newfoundland and Labrador Pharmacy Board (NLPB) and the employee representative – the Pharmacists’ Association of Newfoundland and Labrador (PANL) to work diligently to correct this inequity being experienced by our employees.”

The CICPO also encourages the Government of Newfoundland and Labrador to use this week to reflect on policy choices which may diminish significantly the salaries and benefits for this profession and eliminate the opportunities found in the private sector to deliver additional and advanced medication programs that help to ensure compliance, best use of prescription drugs, and best patient outcomes.

“The demographics of our province show that chronic disease management will become a real budgetary challenge over the coming decade. One of the only real ways to curb the anticipated explosion of prescription drug use is through an expanded scope of practice for pharmacists employed by private sector community pharmacies” adds Kelland-Dyer
The Council is concerned that significant cuts to pharmacy revenues will achieve several undesirable outcomes; a reduction in employment opportunities for these professionals, a reduction in a pharmacist’s wages, a reduction in hours of operation, and the elimination of all non-essential services.
 
Evidence is available in other provinces - where pharmacy revenues have been reduced – that these unanticipated consequences are already occurring. The splintered representation of pharmacists through Allied Health, MUNFA, and PANL may be inadvertently acting to thwart the protection of these essential employees and against finding an equitable solution.
The CICPO is willing to work with other employers such as government, hospital boards, and the university to achieve an equitable benefits and salary package and further willing to work with government to maximize the services our corporations can deliver to the people of Newfoundland and Labrador.

The CICPO also encourages the government to review plans to examine emergency room wait-times. Kelland-Dyer states, “Minister Susan Sullivan missed a very important component in the announced study – the Minister missed pharmacists and pharmacies. It is well established that between 10-20 per cent of emergency room visits are due to drug interactions, medication compliance, and the inability for patients to get the drugs they are prescribed in a timely fashion.” 

Kelland-Dyer concludes, “Our businesses employ a large number of the pharmacists practicing in our province and want to take this opportunity to recognize their service and assure them that as employers we are fighting to protect not only the workplace but also their jobs and the services they deliver to our customers.”
-30-

Wednesday, February 15, 2012

NL Pharmacy oldest registered member Passes Away - A Distinguished Gentleman and Pharmacist

The Council of Independent Community Pharmacy Owners joins with the Pharmacy Community to offer our condolences to the family of Cyril Legrow.

Below please find a story by the Compass Newspaper

Funeral for Cyril LeGrow scheduled for Thursday at Bethany United Church

The oldest and longest registered member of the Newfoundland and Labrador Pharmacy Board, Cyril LeGrow, has passed away, just one week short of his 100th birthday.

LeGrow, who died Feb. 14 in Carbonear, worked as a pharmacist for nearly 78 years.

He was born in Rock Cove, Conception Bay on Feb. 20, 1912. He was educated in Rock Cove and in St. John's after which he completed his four-year pharmacist apprenticeship at McMurdo's in St. John's.

He was first registered with the Newfoundland Pharmacy Board in 1934.

After his graduation, he practised at his father's pharmacy (a Rexall pharmacy) in Broad Cove and later in Carbonear.

In 1975 he sold his pharmacy in Carbonear and established the Pharmacy Department at the Carbonear General Hospital. He retired as chief pharmacist at Carbonear Hospital in May of 1979.
After a long and distinguished career, he was made an honorary member of the then Newfoundland Pharmaceutical Association. Family, friends and colleagues were preparing to celebrate his 100th birthday on Feb. 20.

He is predeceased by his wife and leaves two sons, Malcolm and John.

The funeral will take place at 2 p.m. Thursday, Feb. 16 at Bethany United Church in Carbonear.

Tuesday, February 14, 2012

The Stock Market or Your Health - Pharmacy Models

Below is a pharmacy story from Oregon.

It is interesting to note that the some of the same insurance companies are driving the changes in Canada.

The question remains are we going to follow the crowd (other provinces) who have been heavily lobbied by brand drug companies, insurance companies, and chain drugstores?

This is not the model we need for an aging population - we need more of the services offered by independent stores - not less.

We need to make sure that Newfoundland and Labrador keeps the best network of pharmacies and professionals found anywhere. We need to make sure that all our neighbourhoods and communities have reasonable access to equitable services.

Ontario is the province driving these negative and regressive pharmacy remuneration models and the rest of the provinces are following.

The American system is about 5 years ahead of Ontario - look at the results.

If the stock market is going to be the driver of your health outcomes - then what should you expect?

Workloads, chain stores add to safety risks, Oregon pharmacist survey says

Published: Sunday, February 12, 2012, 10:15 PM     Updated: Monday, February 13, 2012, 12:13 PM
tualatin_pharmacy.JPGView full sizePatrick Bowman opened Tualatin Pharmacy 11 months ago and says his business is building. Pharmacy runs in Bowman's family; his father, sister and he once operated seven stores. Before opening his store in Tualatin, Bowman worked in large chain stores. The experience, he says, was not good.
A retired Paisley minister experiences sudden Parkinson’s disease symptoms, so severe he believes death is imminent — only to learn it’s due to the wrong medication.

A pharmacy technician in Hillsboro sells an Ativan prescription to the wrong man, who gets pulled over for driving erratically.

An Astoria woman suffers a cardiac arrest, and later learns her pharmacy for months had overdosed her with thyroid medication.

These are among the estimated hundreds of pharmacy errors reported in the last few years, either to state agencies or in lawsuits. And some pharmacists say errors are happening more than ever.

A recent survey by the Oregon Board of Pharmacy reported that more than 350 chain pharmacists — more than half of those responding — said their working conditions don’t promote safe and effective patient care.

Many complained it is getting worse. “I feel that we are operating on the edge of disaster,” wrote one. “It is a danger zone for us and our patients.”

Last summer, the state board hosted an online survey for roughly 5,700 licensed pharmacists licensed in Oregon. The results were gratifying and disturbing, says board member Ann Zweber. She hadn’t expected so many to respond — more than 1,300; unfortunately, many responded by reporting safety concerns.

“People had a lot to say,” she says. “It concerns me greatly.”

The survey results describe a profession in transition. Independent pharmacies, which once dominated Oregon, now number just 214 out of about 750 retail pharmacies, according to state records. As independents give way to large chains and mail-order operations, increased competition is inserting a bottom-line mentality into the way people get their pills.

Only 25.9 percent of chain store pharmacists agreed working conditions promoted safe and effective patient care — compared to 76 percent of pharmacists at independent pharmacies.

Not only that, more than 200 hundred chain pharmacists commented about workload and safety.

GS.21PHRM113.jpgView full size
The survey data isn’t perfect. It’s anonymous and pharmacists were allowed to self-report their type of workplace. But the board believes the survey is credible, Zweber said.

Many complained of having to fill more prescriptions each day with fewer staff; of 12-hour shifts with scant breaks; and constant distractions, such as administering immunization shots to augment profits.

One reported quitting a chain job because of feeling “like I’m going to jeopardize the patients every time I stepped into that pharmacy.” Another said because of lack of staff, “we have seen a huge increase in errors. We used to have a couple per month, now we have a couple per week and sometimes more than one in a day!”

Blake Rice, a pharmacist who used to sit on the state board, thinks many errors are caught internally by improved safety procedures. But he agrees chain stores don’t protect the public, giving drugs “the same lack of oversight as the sale of bread and milk or canned beans.”

Several chain store representatives disagreed.

Chrissy Kopple, spokeswoman for the National Association of Chain Drug Stores, said the survey does not reflect chains’ commitment to quality. “NACDS and individual chains will continue to work with the Oregon Board of Pharmacy to maximize patient safety and health.”

“We have a strong safety record because of our on-going education and training for pharmacy associates as well as our continued investment in technology for our pharmacies to maximize accuracy and patient safety,” said Rite Aid spokeswoman Ashley Flower.

There is no data to definitively show more pharmacy errors are occurring, or that they happen more often in chains. Pharmacies do not have to report errors to any public agency. The pharmacy board considers roughly 80 cases a year involving reporting errors. The Oregon Patient Safety Commission encourages voluntary reporting, but only 94 pharmacies have signed up.

The Institute for Safe Medication Practices solicits confidential reports of pharmacy errors from consumers and pharmacists. The group is seeing a steady increase in such reports nationwide, said Michael Cohen, a pharmacist who heads the group.

He said the group is sending its own survey. “It’s hard for the pharmacists who work at these chains to complain too loudly to their manager or go public because they work there and they don’t want to undergo any type of job issue,” Cohen said.

Joseph Lassiter, a Pacific University pharmacy professor who sits on the Oregon Patient Safety Commission, said the Oregon survey results are disturbing. “This survey is a signal for us that there’s something going on.”

The board of pharmacy is considering rules to keep an eye on working conditions. The rules do not set strict workload levels, but allows the board to fine or suspend a pharmacy license over safety issues.

Oregon is not the first to take on the issue, said Carmen Catizone of the National Association of Boards of Pharmacy. Iowa and North Carolina adopted stringent standards, with a workload review of every reported error where a customer was harmed. He said state pharmacy boards have to strike a balance between public safety and workplace interference.

Zweber says the Oregon board seeks the same balance. “I don’t think we’re going to be that specific,” she said.

Patrick Bowman, owner of Tualatin Pharmacy, says he’s not surprised at the survey. He founded his business 11 months ago after working in chains.

“I don’t have headaches anymore. I don’t have trouble sleeping anymore,” he said. “People come to me because they’re not a number.”

Tuesday, January 10, 2012

Will Dunderdale Government protect you from this?

As you are aware the Council of Independent Community Pharmacy Owners has been advising the public and media that changes occurring in Pharmacy Policies throughout Canada may be detrimental to you - the patient.

Recently in Ontario, the College of Pharmacists licensed a mail order pharmacy. This pharmacy located in one physical location - Express Scripts Canada Pharmacy - is promoting the transfer of your prescription from the local pharmacy to them. The medications they are interested in are "maintenance" medications for ongoing chronic conditions.

They promote the advantage of home delivery and say "you will have no need for monthly trips to the retail pharmacy" - and "free" delivery my mail.

They are pleased to advise you to have a 30 day supply on hand before you convert to them - presumably from your local pharmacy.

See the Video Here

Now consider for a moment that all patients of a local pharmacy convert to a mail in pharmacy - what happens to the local pharmacy? I think we can all be wary that your local pharmacy would not survive. Then when you need medications which are not "maintenance" such as anti-biotics or a supply of life saving medications after just having been released from a hospital - where do you go?

If you do not have an insurer or cannot have access to the mail-in pharmacy where do you go?

In the event of a change in medication to take affect immediately - where do you go?

If you want to consult with your pharmacist in person - where do you go?

Perhaps you live in the city and a big chain store is near by - no problem for you right? Well who knows? What if you live in a community where there is only one independent pharmacy what will you do?

The video compares shopping online and banking online to prescriptions online - that is irresponsible. This is your health. This is your health care professional and access.

If you are a cash paying customer or one that is on income assistance where do you go?

If the weather is bad - delayed delivery - where do you go?

This American headquartered company wants all the constant prescriptions without having to deal face to face with you the patients. They also do not want the medications that are once only or infrequent prescriptions. They want to suck all the profits they can away from your community, your province and your neighbourhoods.

What does this have to do with you in Newfoundland and Labrador. The answer to that is two-fold.

1. When contacting the mail order pharmacy by phone - the person on the phone says they expect to be able to deliver services in Newfoundland and Labrador (eastern provinces) by March or May.

2. This is the same company that is attempting to negotiate a contract with independent pharmacies in Newfoundland and Labrador for the acceptance of the Desjardins Card. Obviously they are in a conflict and we now have to deal with that. By the way that would be all provincial government employees.

Now to see what the American Version of the video shows: Press HERE

Here they talk about the accuracy and numbers of prescriptions they fill. How would we know that? Is that going to be allowed in Canada?

One thing is for sure - we must stand up for community and neighbourhood based pharmacies before it is too late.

A final note: they claim you MAY save money. What we will do is keep funneling health care dollars out of our communities and province along with direct personal access to health care professionals. That saves nobody money - but can destroy a very exceptional pharmacy network.




Wednesday, December 28, 2011

Are You getting all the News you Need?



News Release CICPO
23/012/11 St. John’s for immediate release:

CICPO to ask Government to remove Shopper’s Drug Mart Private Label Generics

Ontario Court of Appeal upholds ban on Sanis Products

The Council of Independent Community Pharmacy Owners will formally ask that government remove Sanis generic drugs from the provincial formulary. This follows a decision by the Ontario Court of Appeal that sided with the Government of Ontario. The court said it agreed that the province could reasonably conclude private label generics would reduce competitiveness and drive up prices.
“This is what the Council has advised the Government of Newfoundland and Labrador. This is only one of many concerns we have regarding a pharmacy chain manufacturing its own generic medications”, says Executive Director Sue Kelland-Dyer. 

The provincial government listed Shopper’s Drug Mart generics on the formulary last year, disregarding the legal challenge that was moving forward in Ontario. Kelland-Dyer states, “The CICPO was surprised that Minister Jerome Kennedy moved so quickly to accommodate the large national chain when it moves so slowly to list other generics – thereby wasting hundreds of thousands of health care dollars.”

The Winnipeg Free Press also reported the following statement regarding the ruling:
“BMO Capital Markets analyst Peter Sklar said the Ontario ban won't prevent Shoppers from selling Sanis products in other provinces where they are permitted. In addition, the volume discounts that the retailer gets from its contract drug suppliers will probably offset the revenue it lost when the province banned the fees to it from generic manufacturers.”

“We can take from this that people in our province are expected to protect the stock value of Shopper’s Drug Mart instead of developing policies that protect people and local pharmacies in rural and inner-city neighbourhoods”, concludes Kelland-Dyer.
Complete Court of Appeal Decision: http://www.ontariocourts.on.ca/decisions/2011/2011ONCA0830.pdf
-30-

Thursday, December 15, 2011

Update Dr. Wade Locke addresses the CICPO

This is a note to advise that an update will be posted over the next week or so regarding Dr. Wade Locke's address to the Council of Independent Community Pharmacy Owners at the 2011 AGM.

I will post the power point presentation.

It was an excellent presentation with very timely information.

Unfortunately the Telegram story did not focus on many important points - rather singled in on a question and answer between Dr. Locke and one pharmacy owner.

It is significant to add that Dr. Locke specifically pointed out that he gave the presentation during a very busy time in his year and without a fee - as he thought it was an important event and issue. He certainly contributed a great deal to the pharmacy owners attending and all were appreciative.

Please check back for the updates.

In the meantime I will be posting pictures of the event over the next few days. The following pictures were taken by Todd and Josephine Squires - Todd was this year's recipient of the Pharmacy Owner of the Year Award.

Dr. Wade Locke
 

Some of CICPO Owners accepting their Nu-Quest Pharmacy Service Awards presented by Board Members     Phil O'Keefe and Robert Doyle 

Many more pictures to come - stay tuned.

Tuesday, November 15, 2011

New Talk Show takes on the Pharmacy Issue, Saving Money while maximizing Health Outcomes

Listen to "Talk with Sue and Shannon" Newfoundland and Labrador's newest talk-show this Sunday evening at 8 pm NL time as they explore the pharmacy issue.

There will also be a pharmacist/owner on hand to answer questions about the independent pharmacy model, medication and disease management (diabetes, cardiac, asthma, and other chronic disease), pharmacy services, the court challenge, other provinces, generic drugs versus brand name, saving money for government and patients/customers and the role of pharmacy in the future.

Find out where there are inefficiencies in the government system that are wasting tens of millions of taxpayer dollars.

Please take the time to listen in and become involved in this area of front-line health that affects you, your family, and community.

To take in the show please PRESS HERE

What happened to the Ontario Community Pharmacies Coalition?

The Ontario Community Pharmacies coalition - the love in that was supposed to bridge the gap between the mighty chains and independents appears to have gone up in smoke.
 
If you go to their once active website HERE you will notice the page can no longer be found. The joint material is no longer available.

Here's the "Reader's Digest" so to speak - version of events.

In 2006 the Government of Ontario were rattling the cages of pharmacies by introducing changes to the law regarding the pricing of generics - similar to what the Government of Newfoundland and Labrador has regulated here.

Knowing the devastation that would be caused to independent pharmacy - particularly in rural areas and inner-city pharmacy - independent pharmacies in that province formed the Independent Pharmacy of Ontario to get the message out to the public.

The IPO headed by Ben Shenouda were beginning to make headway as their Public Relations campaign was meeting with good public support. The government was under pressure to do things differently as the people of Ontario generally trusted and agreed with their local independent pharmacies and wanted to have that model protected.

In a clever move by both the Government of Ontario officials and the Canadian Association of Chain Drug Stores - they "con"vinced the independents to come sit at the table together. The IPO dropped its PR campaign and joined with the CACDS the Ontario Pharmacists' Association to form the Ontario Community Pharmacies Coalition to speak with a "united" voice.

A new PR campaign was launched where essentially big chains and retailers were asking the public to support their significant profits and model and in the process - the real plight of the independent stores was lost. that PR campaign was a disaster and the Ontario government came in guns ablazing and hacked the revenues of the pharmacies.

That was then - this is now.

The independents are hurting if not closing, they are cutting back hours, laying off staff, and eliminating or putting a price-tag on services which were once free to the public is a desparate attempt to survive.

Meanwhile as demonstrated in our last post - the big players like Shopper's Drug Mart are out for the slaughter - the cheaper the better.

Please review the Shopper's Drug Mart positioning below:

also plans to seize the opportunity to buy out independent pharmacies that are even more vulnerable

The positive is, we firmly believe there will be a strong opportunity delivered by drug reform that will allow us in a greater way to be a consolidator of the marketplace

Local druggists lamented that some would inevitably have to close down because prescription sales make up a bigger percentage of their sales mix and they wouldn't be able to absorb the hit to their profits. 

And that vulnerability is where Shoppers sees opportunity in the reforms. 

Pilla told analysts Shoppers plans to be "extremely active in the market" as it watches more independents forced into selling as the drug reforms work their way through their balance sheets.


That does not sound like a nice group of people to be planning the future for independent owners and the people they serve right?

Well considering that just months ago - they were holding hands - to present a unified front - we went back to visit the Coalition to see how they were making out.

The web page is no longer there. The kinship appears to have been doused with very cold water - aka reality.

Rural communities that lose a pharmacy may well see a robot soon if not already, the once tremendous model of independent pharmacy is in the fight of its life, and the people of Ontario - if Shoppers and others have their way will one day soon be dealing with a monopoly of chain giants.

We probably don't need to tell you where that will go - right out of the customers pockets as the competition will have been drained away.

Of course Shoppers and the chains will not stop there - any little independent left will be forced to buy their drugs from chain competitors as they now have the right to produce and supply their own private line of generic drugs. The Government of Newfoundland and Labrador has already allowed that here and if they keep it up - your pharmacy may no longer be able to serve you in the manner which is best for you.

So much for sitting at the table with those who ultimately want to eliminate you. Should we expect they will make a deal that's good for independent pharmacies? It has not happened anywhere else. That is why CICPO is fighting hard - to ensure that we have equitable and superior pharmacy services available to all people in our province - regardless of where they live, their mobility, their age, or their insurance status. We are working equally as hard to find solutions for government that would save the monies they would like to save.

They just won't talk - and there's a reason for that - and that reason is not good for the people of Newfoundland and Labrador. Tell us what does the Pharmacists' Association of Newfoundland and Labrador have to say about the comments made this week by the CEO of Shopper's Drug Mart? The silence is deafening.

Saturday, November 12, 2011

Canadian Pharmacists Journal - Story CICPO Court Action

 Latest Story in the Canadian Pharmacists Journal by Kathie Lynas

Pharmacy owners in Newfoundland and Labrador going to court to challenge right of professional body to negotiate compensation deal “Independent pharmacies may end up refusing to take government drug-plan cards, no matter what the government signs with PANL” — Sue Kelland-Dyer, Executive Director, CICPO.

The organization representing the owners of independent community pharmacies in Newfoundland and Labrador has launched a legal challenge of parts of the provincial Pharmacy Act and will have its day in the Newfoundland Supreme Court later this year. The biggest legal issue for the Council of Independent Community Pharmacy Owners (CICPO) is the provision permitting the province’s professional association — the Pharmacists Association of Newfoundland and Labrador (PANL) — to negotiate financial contracts with government on behalf of the owners.

“An advocacy body for the profession has nothing to do with the commercial operations of businesses, and pharmacies — the individual corporations that government signs legal contracts with — are not members of PANL, nor can they vote,” says the executive director of CICPO, Sue Kelland-Dyer.

Using the pharmacist’s professional body for commercial negotiations, she adds, creates a conflict of interest because PANL is attempting to represent both the private sector employers who employ its pharmacist members, as well as the pharmacists themselves. The situation in Newfoundland and Labrador is unique in Canada, says Ms. Kelland-Dyer, noting that other provincial governments negotiate contracts with the owners’ associations as well as pharmacist bodies. “The action of separating the commercial from the profession enhances the interests of both sides. Businesses have a different agenda than the pharmacists.”

The Council has attempted to lobby government for changes to the Pharmacy Act to rectify the situation, but that hasn’t succeeded. So CICPO took legal action and the Supreme Court hearing is scheduled for December 2, 2011.

Meanwhile, PANL is in the process of negotiating a new compensation agreement with the province, in the face of government plans to reduce the price of generic drugs and eliminate the rebate system. A new pricing model for generic drugs could be devastating for independent pharmacy owners, says Ms. Kelland-Dyer. Newfoundland and Labrador, with so many rural and remote areas, has a very high percentage of independents.

 “We have 54 regions in our province that only have independent pharmacies,” she says. “These stores will be in jeopardy, if not closing - reducing hours and not able to properly serve populations spread out over large areas.” In the end, the independent pharmacies may end up refusing to take government drug-plan cards in their stores, she adds. “No matter what the government signs with PANL, that signature doesn’t bind any corporation to an agreement. They may end up with 65 independent
corporations that don’t recognize it, so what have they achieved?”

252 C P J / R P C • N OV EMB E R / D E C EMB E R 2 0 1 1 • VO L 1 4 4 , N O 6

Tuesday, September 27, 2011

CICPO begins the Court Process Today

From the Telegram today - with the complete story to follow in the paper tomorrow. 

The Council of Independent Community Pharmacy Owners (CICPO) made its first appearance in Newfoundland Supreme Court today to begin its challenge of sections of the Pharmacy Act and regulations.

Justice Richard LeBlanc has scheduled Dec. 2 for a full-day hearing.

At issue is a provision in the act that permits the Pharmacists Association of Newfoundland and Labrador (PANL) to negotiate financial contracts with government on behalf of the independent owners.

CICPO is also challenging a recent amendment to the pharmacy regulations extending the notice pharmacists have to give to opt out of the provincial prescription drug program.

Thursday, September 22, 2011

No Pharmacy - No Pharmacist in the Blue Book - so much for PANL

The Pharmacists' Association of Newfoundland and Labrador (PANL) has had the net affect of zero on the Provincial Government - this despite claims by the group regarding its relationship with government. The Tory Blue Book does not even mention the word pharmacist or pharmacy.

The only thing the Blue Book talks about is the lowering of costs on medications. There is nothing about rural pharmacy or the profession.

CETA the Comprehensive Economic Trade Agreement with the European Union - which threatens to extend patents on widely used prescription drugs - no mention. The only thing mentioned are tariffs so products can compete.

This government is not committed to rural or inner-city pharmacy - has not held the profession out for medication and disease management - in fact they have not held out the profession for anything.

Rural and inner-city independent pharmacy is being forgotten - which means people and their health care do not matter to the Progressive Conservatives.

The choice for independent pharmacy is clear - the choice for rural communities and inner-city neighbourhoods is clear. The only party with a platform on pharmacy including the use of pharmacists to their full capacity is the Liberal Party.

Please stay tuned for copy of Minister Tom Marshall's transcript regarding pharmacy.

Tuesday, September 13, 2011

What is happening to Pharmacy and where is the Board? Ask Minister Kennedy!

The Newfoundland and Labrador Pharmacy Board is the self-regulating body for pharmacy in our province. As you have probably heard in the news - they are the body that monitors both the profession and the operations of pharmacies and may hold disciplinary hearings and issue professional sanctions and/or remove a license of either a pharmacist or pharmacy.

By the same token they should also be there to protect their profession - in the interest of public safety and health - in the same manner the College of Physicians and Surgeons do for Physicians. But the NLPB is no match - and it is going to cost everybody in the end.

The Pharmacy Board as is the problem with the PANL is inundated with big corporate agendas - something which the College does not have to deal with. This is because you do not have to be a pharmacist to own a pharmacy. The Board is an elected body and as such staff pharmacists who work for the big conglomerates like Wal-Mart and Shopper's Drug Mart can get elected and form part of a decision making process. This is the beginning of the problem. Let's say it's in the best interests of the large companies to increase the scope of practice of a pharmacy technician - in order that they may reduce the number of pharmacists needed - and thereby reduce their costs - what will there staff have to represent in a committee meeting? That's the name of the game for publicly traded companies - lower costs - increase shareholder value. Is this however the model that best serves the public? The answer is no.

There are a number of changes going on in Canada and every one of them are causing the destruction of the profession of pharmacy including the value of these highly qualified health care experts. You see as I write today the multinational retail giants - Shoppers, Lawtons, Wal-Mart and Costco are designing, lobbying, and controlling the development of policy surrounding the profession - in order that they maximize profits. Pharmacists are being replaced by ATM's, Licensed Practical Nurses, and pharmacy technicians. In Ontario - where the generic drug pricing changes were introduced - these regressive policies are in full swing. Now where a rural pharmacy used to stand - an ATM will move in; or if a rural community no longer has access to an independent pharmacy (due to revenue loss) an LPN can now dispense, sell, and compound prescription drugs. Further where the ratio of pharmacists to pharmacy technicians was 1:2 is now becoming 1:6 if there are any limits at all. Better yet the pharmacy technicians primarily needed in large numbers by the heavy volume drugstores are now being encouraged by these chains to take control by supporting their efforts to organize and advocate. This all comes at as cost to pharmacists.

The reports are fairly common in Ontario now, pharmacy students are having a difficult time getting a placement in drugstores in order that they may graduate - and when they do the salaries now being offered are 1/3 to 1/2 what they used to be. The public relations spin by the big drugstore chains is that now pharmacists are going to be able to do more of what they are trained to do - by having techs take care of the less significant tasks. The spin goes on to say pharmacists will be paid for med-checks,  injections, and counselling. The pharmacist is paid by their employer - they do not receive direct payment for their increased scope of practice - in fact they are now being paid less for doing more. Meanwhile the corporation that employs them bring in more cash with a cheaper payroll.

Any reasonably minded person would ask - if an LPN or an ATM or a pharmacy technician can do the job - what is a pharmacist for? A large corporate drugstore or retail chain will examine the human resources necessary to pump out prescription drugs and adjust their staff needs accordingly. So if a pharmacist is restricted to counselling and medication checks and if the government only pays the corporation a set fee to do those tasks - the pharmacists salaries will actually go down. The money making volume can now be completed by techs and machines.

Is this good for the public? No it is not. The pharmacist should as with all experts in health care being enjoying more stability in the workforce and expect professional salaries for the investment they made in their education. For pharmacists - sadly - the opposite is true. The large corporations in Ontario are now reportedly reducing hours, salaries, and benefits for pharmacists. Schools of Pharmacy in universities are now experiencing a difficulty in achieving placements for their students. At the rate things are going these Schools will have to downsize to adjust to the new market reality. Ironically this is happening at a time when Memorial's School of Pharmacy is looking to expand with new facilities and more seats. If one looks at the changes now occurring in Ontario and the fact the Minister Jerome Kennedy is determined to follow that model - our School of Pharmacy could actually be downsized if not eliminated altogether.

So back to the Newfoundland and Labrador Pharmacy Board - The Executive Committee is comprised of 2 pharmacists from the School of Pharmacy and 2 pharmacists from Shopper's Drug Mart. Of nine Board members only 1 is an independent pharmacy owner.

The Chair of all the Professional Practice Committee and sub-committees is Sandra Carey. Ms Carey is a pharmacist and an employee of the Health Initiative Inc. in Toronto which is an agency of McCann Healthcare Worldwide which is a subsidiary of Interpublic Inc. This conglomerate is a global provider of advertising and marketing services. At the most basic level - it's the attempted control of market share. When it comes to health care and pharmacy - who would want such control of market share? With 41,000 employess how much independent influence does Ms. Carey have?

This big corporate agenda is going after all policies related to pharmaceuticals. The bigwigs of retail pharmacy - the giant chains - are lobbying governments to achieve what's best for their shareholders - not what's best for you and I.

Are they succeeding? Well Minister Kennedy could be the poster boy for this initiative - Shopper's Drug Mart is definitely controlling the development of pharmacy policy. So far they have managed to have their own private line of prescription drugs listed on the provincial formulary, they have managed to have the Department of Health turn a blind eye to Seniors rights in personal care homes, and they have managed to keep independent pharmacy out of the Minister's office. They have lobbied directly, and indirectly at $500 a plate political dinners.

As for the Pharmacy Board - it is becoming obvious that they too are turning a blind eye when the public interest is being affected. You can bet your last dollar that the College of Physicians and Surgeons would long since have a like problem dealt with.